Like most people interested in personal finance, you’re probably focused on keeping tabs on your investments. If you own any shares in the Wal-Mart (WMT) corporation, either directly or indirectly, you should be keep yourself informed about your company’s conduct.
This posting is about the implications of the Wal-Mart spying scandal. If you have been following the story, Wal-Mart has been implicated in engaging in ongoing surveillance of its employees, its company officers, its suppliers, its critics, and its shareholders. While this is not the first time Wal-Mart has gotten in trouble because of surveillance, in recent years Wal-Mart’s security efforts have become more aggressive under the leadership of CEO H. Lee Scott and security chief Kenneth H. Senser.
The timing of these revelations is bad for Wal-Mart. Since Lee Scott took over the company’s mangement, there have been increasing concerns about declining profits and worries that Wal-Mart has been underperforming relative to its rival, Target Corp (TGT). The company has additionally been receiving negative publicity due to the ongoing tainted pet food scandal. In short, Wal-Mart has been implicated in big time spying, has been showing signs of slowing growth and is getting a bad rap in the media.
Make no mistake. The slowing growth is not Wal-Mart’s problem. Wal-Mart’s problem is disrespect of its shareholders. While it may be justifiable to survey one’s workers it is never acceptable to spy on shareholders. This shows a profound disregard for the fundamental basis of capitalism: provision of profits to owners. Not only has Wal-Mart’s management failed to provide adequate returns, their response to ownership complaints is investigation and character assassination.
Wal-Mart is not and never will be a part of my portfolio. If you care about ethics in the companies you own, you’ll vote with your feet also.
James Carl Hendrickson
Like DINKS? Subscribe!
Subscribe to get the latest DINKS Finance content by email.